Видео

That’d be one big pop up emitter! The hole is ~24” square.

Well. I backfill with sand and pea gravel with a nice deep hole at the bottom when I run underground drainpipe

Sod on top with 3" dirt hasn't failed me

Not related to irrigation in any way.

Nope, not a sump.

Thank you!

Thanks. Highly recommend trying it yourself!

Thank you.

OSHA approved Jesus sandals.

Not sure what you’re asking…?

Tightbond 2

Not necessary

Thank you for your deep, detailed analysis.

$1.44/ea on McMaster. Well worth it for the time/hassle savings.

It’s a basic thing that thy got wrong. It’s annoying to use the thing, and on top of the other issues it has, at the price they sell it at, it’s a dud. (FYI, I have a longer video where I talk about the other issues.)

@@AdamsLab They got a lot right though too. Maybe they will make a V2 and address these problems.

I don’t think that’ll make the non-functioning tape lock work…

If you like it and it works for you 👍

I wouldn’t do it with the car on. Other than that I think the risk is pretty low. You do want to wear gloves to keep skin oil off the bulb as that could damage it.

@@AdamsLab Yeah, definitely won't be doing this with the car on 😆 Btw, do you recall the brand of bulb you bought ? Prices seem to be all over the board online, thx

Don’t recall the brand, it was the cheapest option NAPA offered.

🙄

OSHA approved!

It’s the fatal flaw _to me_. That you can’t use it how they intend is pretty bad. And why don’t keep mentioning the number of subscribers I have?

You've got 0 subscribers. Go to sleep so you're awake for school in the morning

@@NSarg04 who are you? Trying to get attention? Awwww….

@@SymptomsOfCodelmao L

@@SymptomsOfCode - Whoa there, that's the pot calling the kettle black.

Nice try

Seriously, what is your use case? U didn’t mention it.

@@SymptomsOfCode - I’m proficient in the art of sarcasm. You will not get me to respond to your silliness with an actual answer.

@@AdamsLab because u dont have a use case! Just trashing new innovations without providing details.

Tell me, do you get paid to astroturf, or do you do it just for the giggles?

I can see how it would be handy in your use case. Perfect for that. I’ll note that REEKON commented and said that the function of the lock is by design. They basically said it’s too complicated to make a locking mechanism that actually locks 🤷‍♂️

🤔

The resolution is exactly what it’s supposed to be, for better or worse, I shot this as a vertical video. Also, the word you’re looking for is “horizontal.” Speaking of words and phrases, I suggest you lookup the definitions of “quick” and “off the cuff.” It might help explain some of the “deficiencies” you’ve pointed out.

Apologies, I’m not familiar with programming PIC microcontrollers.

@@AdamsLab Daem :o( Me neither. Thanks for reply.

Only 1yr warranty

Yes, I’m aware. The issue is that you can’t get an inside measurement, pushing the tape against an object, without using two hands.

ruclips.net/video/uB2CpXYslYM/видео.htmlsi=SWyPY3NdiLHI1l-2

Thanks - I have a video on making in in case you’re interested.

I’m confused by this comment.

What in hen are you talking about? Damn bro, smoke you another one.

I mean, every other tape measure I’ve used locks properly 🤷‍♂️

@@AdamsLab an autolock is a very specific mechanism (push to activate) that differs from a push fixed lock (and has much different mechanics) to it

Ok? That may be, I still consider it a design flaw that the tape moves with the slightest touch/jostle. Sorry for being honest…

@@AdamsLab no need to apologize just wanted to explain that they are different mechanisms with different intentions. We are happy to hear your feedback and just wanted to help provide some behind to scenes as to the differences and acknowledging that it is intentionally different.

@@AdamsLabJust fyi there are in fact many tape measures that operate exactly like that. To that degree? I don’t know. But the mechanism is definitely a thing.

Me too.

“iT’S NoT MeAnT FoR YoU” doesn’t excuse the crappy lock.

What looks good to one person maybe doesn’t to another

The lack of a functioning lock is objectively bad. You don’t have to be a “pRoFeSsIoNaL” to realize that.

@@AdamsLab mine works fine

Cool

Yeah, I suspect like most companies REEKON pays people for “reviews.”

@@AdamsLab we never pay for reviews and never will, discussion and feedback is essential to making better products and we welcome feedback from all sides and perspectives!

Free product in exchange for a review = paid review. And I know for a fact that you’ve done that (at least in the past).

@@AdamsLab yes we have done that but dont compensate for reviews with any payment or ask for any editorial approval before being posted - users are free to post whatever they want based on their impressions of the product

​@@REEKONTools - I get it's an inconvenient truth, but getting free product is payment and incentivizes people (influencers 🤮) to not speak honestly on the bad things about a product. If I 💩on your product, fair or not, you're probably not going to send me anymore free stuff. While a reviewer/influencer may not rely on the product directly (there not turning around and selling it for example), they do rely on being able to create content around the product(s) they receive for free. They need the product to make content, you want your product to be promoted, you have a symbiotic relationship. It's quid pro quo, it's you scratch our back, we'll scratch yours. That no longer works (for you) if the reviewer/influencer is saying bad things about your product. If it no longer works for you, it no longer works for the reviewer/influencer because you're no longer going to send them free product to make their content around. While the reviewer/influencer may have the best of intentions, this symbiotic relationship is ripe for creating perverse incentives. You don't have to directly influence the review via editorial approval or have it spelled out in the contract, because the understanding of what you do for the reviewer/influencer and what they do for you is baked into the *business relationship* you create when you exchange goods (your product) for services (the review).

Interesting, other than the issues I mentioned I haven’t had any errors.

Updated.

@@AdamsLab Page not found bro!

@@guest238 - Works for me 🤷‍♂️